Tuesday, February 20, 2018

Jethro Tull 13: Repeat

Less than two years after one Tull “hits” collection, somebody thought it was a good idea to release another. Curiously, most of the tracks on Repeat—subtitled The Best Of Jethro Tull Vol. II—are heavier rockers than the more folk-influenced direction Ian Anderson was currently in. That means there’s a lot of power for FM radio fans, starting with the edit of “Minstrel In The Gallery”, through “Cross Eyed Mary” and “A New Day Yesterday”. “Bourée” quiets things down slightly, making a smooth transition into “Thick As A Brick (Edit #4)”, from halfway into the first side of that album.

Detail-oriented readers will notice that all of these songs predate M.U. While they’d only released two albums since that one, it says a little something about the quality when this set lives that far in the past, if you will. “War Child” and “A Passion Play (Edit #9)” (from the last part of that album) keep it heavy without being overly familiar, and “To Cry You A Song” goes all the way back to Benefit. Only with the title track from Too Old To Rock ‘N’ Roll: Too Young To Die! are we brought up to date. However, fans got something of a bonus in “Glory Row”, a previously unreleased track featuring prominent accordion that has since been added to reissues of—you guessed it—War Child.

Repeat is a decent listen, but the “better” songs were arguably already on its predecessor. That said, those wishing to keep their collections slim would have enjoyed the convenience.

Jethro Tull Repeat—The Best Of Jethro Tull Vol. II (1977)—

1 comment:

  1. I guess Chrysalis wanted some Christmas product, the band wasn't cooperating, so here we were. In retrospect, it's a good idea that "Songs of the Wood" was avoided here, since those songs would have been somewhat out of place. A decent choice of deeper cuts. Both "Glory Row" and "Rainbow Blues" were a lot better than half of "Warchild", so it's hard to figure out why they were cut in the first place. I don't know of this collection ever got remastered like "M.U". did. Like that album, it needed to, since the sound is lousy by today's standards. Both of these were enough for casual fans at the time, but these encouraged me to take a deeper dive.

    ReplyDelete