Friday, October 9, 2009

Bob Dylan 35: Under The Red Sky

Ringo Starr once said that one of the worst jam sessions he ever played in included himself, Ron Wood, Eric Clapton, and a whole bunch of other people said to be among the best players around. His point was that just putting such people together doesn’t guarantee quality.

Such is the case with Under The Red Sky. With all the promise of Oh Mercy, and despite the inspired fluke that was the Traveling Wilburys, Bob came back a year later with another water-treading collection of songs dominated by big names. (Empire Burlesque anyone?) Here’s proof that all the stars and a hot producer—in this case, Don Was, then riding high on the wave of the B-52s, Bonnie Raitt and, of course, Was (Not Was)—don’t equal success. The luminaries dotting the credits run the gamut from George Harrison, David Lindley, the Vaughan brothers, Bruce Hornsby, David Crosby, Elton John and Slash to Kenny Aronoff on drums, Randy Jackson on bass (in the wilderness years between Journey and American Idol) and Al Kooper, who was probably happy to tell the same old stories to anyone who’d listen.

The slow thuds that start “Wiggle Wiggle” should be the first sign that something’s wrong. The title track makes little sense, unless it’s taken as a kids’ song. “Unbelievable” was the only choice for a single and lead video, but it didn’t help sales. “Born In Time” is just too syrupy; it’s a shame, since takes exist of this from the Oh Mercy sessions, and you can almost hear a decent track in there. “T.V. Talkin’ Song” just makes him sound like a cranky old man.

“10,000 Men” is another nursery rhyme, with a great windup opening, which “2 X 2” lacks. While the former seems to hint at a future direction, the latter squanders any of its potential. “God Knows”—another Oh Mercy refugee—has some potential, but “Handy Dandy” is a direct musical ripoff of “Like A Rolling Stone”. “Cat’s In The Well” is okay for an ending, and still figures in his setlists today, but do you really feel like playing this album again?

Maybe these are just good songs recorded badly. But the songs on Under The Red Sky simply weren’t there. Most seem to be repetitive lists and litanies, without any of the wordplay and insight central to the brand. Granted, he was also busy with another Wilburys album while all this was happening, but we’re getting ahead of ourselves. It fits in the pantheon below Desire as a Dylan album that some people love but we just don’t get.

The album’s defenders maintain that it should be heard as Bob intended: as a children’s album. It turns out that he did have a toddler around, so that could well be the inspiration. But if there’s anyone out there who sings their kids to sleep at night with lines like “wiggle till you vomit fire,” “ten thousand men on a hill… some of ‘em gonna get killed,” “let me eat his head off so you can really see,” “how much poison did they inhale?” or “the drinks are ready and the dogs are going to war,” start saving up for therapy, just in case.

Bob Dylan Under The Red Sky (1990)—2

10 comments:

  1. I believe the "Randy Jackson" session player on Bass is an American rocker best known for his role as frontman for the Long Island rock band Zebra, not the AM Idol Randy J.

    ReplyDelete
  2. i appreciate that you said this album ranks below desire...but for the love of god it isnt even comparable.....desire is an album of the highest quality, in the top three of bob albums i think., while this album is down at the bottom with knocked out loaded, down in the groove and empire burlesque. you really need to re-evaluate Desire man...anyway i do love your blogs and looking forward to the next.peace

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually, Under the Red Sky and Empire Burlesque are probably Dylan's most underrated albums. (Infidels and New Morning might be his most overrated). Under the Red Sky features some of the best singing and playing on any Dylan album. Who says the greatness of a Dylan album is determined by the complexity of the word play? Read Paul Williams's reflections on Under the Red Sky and Empire Burlesque in his Performing Artist series (Vol. 3 and Vol. 2, respectively) to find an in-depth appreciation of the two albums.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In praise of ‘Wiggle wiggle ’ - those portentous ‘slow thuds’, and the pseudodrama of the guitar intro, ludicrously punctured by the opening line of the song, make it one of the funniest and most effective album openers by anybody ever; ‘Wiggle till you vomit fire’ is poetry on a level infinitely superior to any convolutions about diplomats, shoulders and Siamese cats; and yes, my infant son (degree ceremony today, congratulations Daniel) absolutely adored it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is a really, really old, outdated perspective on the album. WHat rock have you been living under? There are quite a few duds on UTRS, sure, but the title track is not one of them. And Handy Dandy is a classic. Astonishing that someone can take the time to post this sort of thing and know so little, well, I dunno what to say. This album is worth a lot more than the entire output of the dreary old Traveling Wilburys.

    ReplyDelete
  6. George -- most of the evidence I can find is that "Dawg" does indeed play bass, not the Jackson brother or the guitarist from Zebra.

    Carl -- thanks for the input and keep reading!

    Anonymous #1 -- I've read Performing Artist 1 and 2; Williams tends to gush. I'll keep an eye out for Volume 3.

    Anonymous #2/Daniel's dad or mom -- great assessment of "Wiggle Wiggle". I'll keep that in mind!

    Anonymous #3 -- the same rock where I play UTRS once a year to see if I've missed anything, and for going on 20 years, I haven't. Though I will be reconsidering "Wiggle Wiggle".

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's a kids' album with nursery rhymes quoted on near enough every song. It's dedicated to his 4 year old daughter "Gabby Goo Goo". Don't take it so serious!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Try Michael Gray's book, 'Song & Dance Man', for a reappraisal of UTRS. You might be surprised what hidden depths Gray reveals.

    ReplyDelete
  9. wardo -- Williams tends to gush, so what? Don't we all when it comes to our favorite Dylan performances? Williams' tastes in Dylan performances and mine overlap most frequently. His view is the most empathetic of all Dylan commentators; by writing about his own responses to the music he gets closer to the heart of how Dylan's music moves certain listeners so deeply.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A little gushing is fine, but it seems like he loves everything that comes out of Bob's mouth. Which, again is fine. (As opposed to Clinton Heylin who seems to hate everything that comes out of Bob's mouth.) As for Michael Gray, I've read the Encyclopedia, which has its moments, and an old, old edition of Song & Dance Man.

    ReplyDelete